The Story Behind The Atomic Bomb Essay Example For Students

The Story Behind The Atomic Bomb Essay The Story Behind The Atomic Bomb Essay Atomic Bomb August 6th, 1945, 70,000 lives were ended in a matter of seconds. The United States had dropped an atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima. Today many argue over whether or not the US should have taken such a drastic measure. Was it entirely necessary that we drop such a devastating weapon? Yes, it was. First, look at what was going on at the time the decision was made. The U.S had been fighting a massive war since 1941. Morale was most likely low, and resources were probably at the same level as morale. However, each side continued to fight, and both were determined to win. Obviously, the best thing that could have possibly have happened would have been to bring the war to a quick end, with a minimum of casualties. What would have happened had the A-bomb not been used? The most obvious thing is that the war would have continued. We will write a custom essay on The Story Behind The Atomic Bomb specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now U.S forces; therefore, would have had to invade the home island of Japan. Imagine the number of casualties that could have occurred if this would have happened Also, our forces would not only have to fight off the Japanese military, but they would have to defend themselves against the civilians of Japan as well. It was also a fact that the Japanese government had been equipping the commoners with any kind of weapon they could get their hands on. It is true that this could mean a Japanese citizen could have anything from a gun to a spear, but many unsuspecting soldiers might have fallen victim to a surprise spear attack! The number of deaths that would have occurred would have been much greater, and an invasion would have taken a much longer period of time. The Japanese would have continued to fight the US with all of what they had; spears, guns, knives, whatever they could get their hands on, just as long as they continued to fight the enemy. As mentioned before, it is a fact that some civilians had been ready to fight our military with spears! What made it possible that the Japanese would resort to using spears? Why wouldnt they use guns or other weapons? Well, the truth was, the government just didnt have the resources to give out a gun to just any citizen. US naval blockades are one of the major reasons that Japan was so low on resources, and a main point opponents of the decision to drop the bomb constantly bring up. Japan obviously was very low on resources. Japanese civilians were ready to die with spears in their hands, surely the military would do the same. Besides, the Japanese military did still have some resources to go on. So again I must bring out the fact that Japan could have continued to fight, and they would have. And Im sure anyone can realize what would happen if the war continued; more deaths. Admiral William Leahy, Chief of Staff to President Roosevelt and President Truman, wrote, By the beginning of September 1944, Japan was almost completely defeated through a practically complete sea and air blockade. If that was true, how could they have continued to fight and rack up enemy kills? If the Chief of Staff to the President figured they would soon surrender around September 1944; why were they still fighting almost a year later? And how can we be so sure that any other estimates on when the war would end would be correct? Basically, we cant. For all anyone knows, Japan would have kept fighting. It was the atomic bomb that forced Japan to surrender and in turn saved thousands if not millions of lives. How can anyone be so sure that Japan would continue to fight? No one can say exactly what would have happened, because lets face it, no one really knows. .u0c59d2dd765dbe2105bd824113b921a8 , .u0c59d2dd765dbe2105bd824113b921a8 .postImageUrl , .u0c59d2dd765dbe2105bd824113b921a8 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u0c59d2dd765dbe2105bd824113b921a8 , .u0c59d2dd765dbe2105bd824113b921a8:hover , .u0c59d2dd765dbe2105bd824113b921a8:visited , .u0c59d2dd765dbe2105bd824113b921a8:active { border:0!important; } .u0c59d2dd765dbe2105bd824113b921a8 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u0c59d2dd765dbe2105bd824113b921a8 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u0c59d2dd765dbe2105bd824113b921a8:active , .u0c59d2dd765dbe2105bd824113b921a8:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u0c59d2dd765dbe2105bd824113b921a8 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u0c59d2dd765dbe2105bd824113b921a8 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u0c59d2dd765dbe2105bd824113b921a8 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u0c59d2dd765dbe2105bd824113b921a8 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u0c59d2dd765dbe2105bd824113b921a8:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u0c59d2dd765dbe2105bd824113b921a8 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u0c59d2dd765dbe2105bd824113b921a8 .u0c59d2dd765dbe2105bd824113b921a8-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u0c59d2dd765dbe2105bd824113b921a8:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Octavio Ocampo Essay Its possible Japan was just about to surrender, but most evidence would not agree with that statement. Im sure most have heard of a group of men called the Kamikaze. Kamikaze were suicide pilots. They would load an airplane up with explosives and try to nose-dive it into an enemy target. Think about what must be on this pilots mind. Imagine the undying love he must have for his country. He would fight until the end, for his emperor and his country. The scary thing about this is the majority of the .

Hispanic Americans essays

Hispanic Americans essays Since the United States started counting the population, African Americans have always been the most dominant minority. However, now Hispanics outnumber African Americans as the largest minority group, with 38.8 million of them now living in the USA, according to Census Bureau estimates. The figures, as of July 2003, show a 9.8% increase since the Census was taken in April 2000. The U.S. population grew 2.5% to 288.4 million in the same period. Hispanics accounted for half of the national increase. Non-Hispanic blacks, including people who say they're black and another race, grew at a much slower rate than Hispanics, up 3.1%, to 36.6 million. Hispanics make up 13% of the nation's population. The main emigrating country for these new Hispanic Americans is Mexico, the table below shows:- According to Steven Camarota, a member of the Centre for Studies of Immigration, the majority of the immigrants are in the sector of the services: manual operators, manufacturers and workers. Nevertheless, many operate companies in more complex sectors and work in technical management, marketing research, and agriculture. Camarota said that at the moment 32.4 million people born in other countries now reside in the United States. That 32.4 million make up 14.3% of the labour force of the nation. One in three immigrants is Mexican, with a total of 9.6 million, according to this study. Camarotas study also found that the Mexicans are also in the first place as far as the number of people in poverty, with 2.3 million, or 24.4% As the new largest minority, the Hispanic population are going to face problems but also have opportunities available to them, opportunities that other minorities didnt have during the times of their population explosions. Theyre also going to face competition and discrimination from other minority groups, as well as other Hispanics. Whether crossing the Mexican border or arriving by boat or plane from C...

Persuasive speech Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 3

Persuasive speech - Essay Example The laws should be such that they should reflect the expectations and aspirations of the people. In a democratic society, laws reflect as to what people want and expect from the state. A poll conducted in March 2013 showed that a majority of the Americans do favor tougher gun control laws like barring people from purchasing automatic and assault weapons and conducting a background check on people buying arms (White, 2013). Hence, it goes without saying that the present statutory position that allows people to readily buy automatic and assault weapons is averse to the actual wishes of the people. The state and federal governments could not abjectly ignore the wishes of a majority section of the society. Without pointing to any specific incident, it is a matter of common knowledge that massive public shootings in the recent times have shocked the conscience of the masses. These shootings led to the death of many innocent and unsuspecting citizens in a ruthless and shocking manner. It was primarily owing to the lax gun laws that the perpetrators responsible for these shootings were able to purchase sophisticated weapons, which they later used to kill unarmed and defense less civilians. Hence, the natural premise that supports the tougher gun control laws is that they will certainly lead to a decline in, if not a stopping of the instances of mass shootings and will better the law and order situation. The detractors of the tougher gun control laws put forward the argument that if the laws governing the purchase of weapons are made stringent and strict, it will curtail their democratic right to bear arms and will prevent them from easily purchasing weapons, as and when they require. They believe that there should be no restraining mechanism that should prevent people from buying any weapons they feel like buying. However, the truth is that such logic is totally